Did the later Harry Potter films benefit from having one director do the last four films? And if so, should that model be re-applied to the James Bond franchise in spite of the eventual disasters that produced back in the Cubby Broccoli days?
By "disasters" I mean that both Guy Hamilton (4 Bonds) and John Glen (5 Bonds) have steaming piles of crap on their hands.
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
A question I would like to answer at some point
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Post-Craig review: Goldfinger
Goldfinger is the Donald Trump of Bond Films, and I'm not talking about the titular character being a fat swindler with a penchant for g...
-
Every once in a while there's a fortuitous intersection of two unrelated stimuli that provokes a profound reaction and inspires the incr...
-
The excessive profanity and capitalized red text throughout this blog post is an intentional creative decision . LIGHT YOUR FUCKING SETS,...
No comments:
Post a Comment