Did the later Harry Potter films benefit from having one director do the last four films? And if so, should that model be re-applied to the James Bond franchise in spite of the eventual disasters that produced back in the Cubby Broccoli days?
By "disasters" I mean that both Guy Hamilton (4 Bonds) and John Glen (5 Bonds) have steaming piles of crap on their hands.
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
A question I would like to answer at some point
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Image of the Week: Pearl Harbor and the Fog of War
I follow a lot of naval history accounts, so this "Japanese map showing their assessment of the damage done to the United States flee...
-
Every once in a while there's a fortuitous intersection of two unrelated stimuli that provokes a profound reaction and inspires the incr...
-
Back to the very beginning. This is a lie. "The beginning" would surely be a review of Ian Fleming's 1953 novel Casino Royale...
No comments:
Post a Comment